• What was the end game in the banning of emotes?

      • .
      • Fscking Moron
      • Re: What was the end game in the banning of emotes?
        Posted 09/13/2017 02:07 AM - Hide
      • . posted:
        If it was to curb anti-Semitism it seems to have failed. ;screech;

        Get that faux grin off your vile hooknosed face, heeb. We all know it's eating you up inside.

        Shut the fuck up, kike.
        \
        ;smug;
      •   [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
      • .
      • Fscking Moron
      • Re: What was the end game in the banning of emotes?
        Posted 09/13/2017 09:19 AM - Hide
      • and now that ive discoverd themb ;turtle3;
      •   [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
      • .
      • Fscking Moron
      • Re: What was the end game in the banning of emotes?
        Posted 09/13/2017 09:25 AM - Hide
      • An attempt to placate hymie. Which is impossible. Instead hams just flashed his vagina.
      •   [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
      • .
      • Fscking Moron
      • Re: What was the end game in the banning of emotes?
        Posted 09/13/2017 09:26 AM - Hide
      • They got replaced by identical non-emote pics and nothing changed.
      • Permalink
          [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
      • .
      • Fscking Moron
      • Re: What was the end game in the banning of emotes?
        Posted 09/13/2017 09:27 AM - Hide
      • . posted:
        They got replaced by identical non-emote pics and nothing changed.
        \
        :winner:
      •   [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
      • Re: What was the end game in the banning of emotes?
        Posted 09/13/2017 09:29 AM - Hide
      • . posted:
        If it was to curb anti-Semitism it seems to have failed. :lol:

        It was all about a one dollar bet between Hans and I to see if Hans could make every single board Nazis cry at the same time.

        I paid up a couple weeks ago.
      •   [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
      • .
      • Fscking Moron
      • Re: What was the end game in the banning of emotes?
        Posted 09/13/2017 09:31 AM - Hide
      • VP_Spiro_T_Cheney posted:
        . posted:
        If it was to curb anti-Semitism it seems to have failed. :lol:

        It was all about a one dollar bet between Hans and I to see if Hans could make every single board Nazis cry at the same time.

        I paid up a couple weeks ago.

        How long until that dollar walked up to the Wendy's $1 value menu?
      •   [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
      • .
      • Fscking Moron
      • Re: What was the end game in the banning of emotes?
        Posted 09/13/2017 12:10 PM - Hide
      • . posted:
        VP_Spiro_T_Cheney posted:
        . posted:
        If it was to curb anti-Semitism it seems to have failed. :lol:

        It was all about a one dollar bet between Hans and I to see if Hans could make every single board Nazis cry at the same time.

        I paid up a couple weeks ago.

        How long until that dollar walked up to the Wendy's $1 value menu?

        Is Wendy's kosher?
      •   [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
      • Re: What was the end game in the banning of emotes?
        Posted 09/13/2017 12:22 PM - Hide
      • I reckon it goes like this...

        Only an admin can add an emote. Schlomo was an emote. Emotes are tied to an admin.
        Anyone can add a fauxmote. Kekeke is a fauxmote. Fauxmotes are user content, not board features/objects.
        F169's Schlomo emote has been used (and viewed) a staggering number of times. Enough to be concerning for an admin.

        Now that it has been shifted from emote to fauxmote, the admin can consider it user-added content, subject to the forum disclaimer, and can remove himself from responsibility for its use.

        :twocents:
      •   [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
      • .
      • Fscking Moron
      • .
      • Fscking Moron
      • Re: What was the end game in the banning of emotes?
        Posted 09/13/2017 12:47 PM - Hide
      • Jimmy_Tomorrow posted:
        I reckon it goes like this...

        Only an admin can add an emote. Schlomo was an emote. Emotes are tied to an admin.
        Anyone can add a fauxmote. Kekeke is a fauxmote. Fauxmotes are user content, not board features/objects.
        F169's Schlomo emote has been used (and viewed) a staggering number of times. Enough to be concerning for an admin.

        Now that it has been shifted from emote to fauxmote, the admin can consider it user-added content, subject to the forum disclaimer, and can remove himself from responsibility for its use.

        :twocents:

        :motorcycle:

        THIS KIND OF PERCEPTIVE THINKING IS WHY JT IS BRIGADE COMMANDER. AND ALSO WHY HE WILL MOST LIKELY EVENTUALLY LEAVE THIS DUMP IN DISGUST
      •   [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
      • .
      • Fscking Moron
      • Re: What was the end game in the banning of emotes?
        Posted 09/13/2017 01:50 PM - Hide
      • Jimmy_Tomorrow posted:
        I reckon it goes like this...

        Only an admin can add an emote. Schlomo was an emote. Emotes are tied to an admin.
        Anyone can add a fauxmote. Kekeke is a fauxmote. Fauxmotes are user content, not board features/objects.
        F169's Schlomo emote has been used (and viewed) a staggering number of times. Enough to be concerning for an admin.

        Now that it has been shifted from emote to fauxmote, the admin can consider it user-added content, subject to the forum disclaimer, and can remove himself from responsibility for its use.

        :twocents:

        Sounds right. Now what is different about schlomo that doesn't apply to the tard, beaner, chink and mammy emotes?
      •   [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
      • Re: What was the end game in the banning of emotes?
        Posted 09/13/2017 10:42 PM - Hide
      • . posted:
        Sounds right. Now what is different about schlomo that doesn't apply to the tard, beaner, chink and mammy emotes?

        Popularity.

        Google returns results by popularity and usage. Let's say you Google "F169bbs". Google likes to offer you choices in the form of your search results. Top Stories, for example. Images, also a commonly featured results set, is often displayed before the web results themselves, showing a query's top images. If statistically the most used/viewed image associated with this board is Schlomo, that is the number one associated image Google will return for F169bbs.

        Instead of Google's default searching of the web, you can optionally use Google Images to search for anything. If you searched "F169bbs" in Google Images, you received the same top result. Schlomo. Lots of it, too. Schlomo is also both a proper name and an old-school caricature, not unlike "Sambo"; so both the image itself and its name have meaning to Google. Whereas "kekeke" would not.

        In this current unhinged climate, that association can bring a massive unwanted hassle (or worse) that could endanger the existence of the forum itself and, certainly not secondarily, make life miserable for Hans. Getting kicked off of a server, for instance, would be a huge headache. And such things can snowball very badly.

        In this way Hans is also, effectively, saving us from ourselves.

        It is a smart move to remove Schlomo from a fixed-position as part of the F169bbs Admin-owned emote collection and drop it to the fauxmotes where an anonymous user is responsible for it being there. Even smarter would be to delete it regularly so any given instance of it cannot never accumulate a significant number of hits. The image itself would still be there but would never numerically bring attention to itself; Google would view each new instance of it as an entirely new minor object.
      •   [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
      • .
      • Fscking Moron
      • Re: What was the end game in the banning of emotes?
        Posted 09/13/2017 10:49 PM - Hide
      • Jimmy_Tomorrow posted:
        Popularity.

        Google returns results by popularity and usage. Let's say you Google "F169bbs". Google likes to offer you choices in the form of your search results. Top Stories, for example. Images, also a commonly featured results set, is often displayed before the web results themselves, showing a query's top images. If statistically the most used/viewed image associated with this board is Schlomo, that is the number one associated image Google will return for F169bbs.

        Instead of Google's default searching of the web, you can optionally use Google Images to search for anything. If you searched "F169bbs" in Google Images, you received the same top result. Schlomo. Lots of it, too. Schlomo is also both a proper name and an old-school caricature, not unlike "Sambo"; so both the image itself and its name have meaning to Google. Whereas "kekeke" would not.

        In this current unhinged climate, that association can bring a massive unwanted hassle (or worse) that could endanger the existence of the forum itself and, certainly not secondarily, make life miserable for Hans. Getting kicked off of a server, for instance, would be a huge headache. And such things can snowball very badly.

        In this way Hans is also, effectively, saving us from ourselves.

        It is a smart move to remove Schlomo from a fixed-position as part of the F169bbs Admin-owned emote collection and drop it to the fauxmotes where an anonymous user is responsible for it being there. Even smarter would be to delete it regularly so any given instance of it cannot never accumulate a significant number of hits. The image itself would still be there but would never numerically bring attention to itself; Google would view each new instance of it as an entirely new minor object.

        What was the end game in the banning of emotes? #1
      •   [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
      • .
      • Fscking Moron
      • .
      • Fscking Moron
      • Re: What was the end game in the banning of emotes?
        Posted 09/14/2017 10:37 AM - Hide
      • . posted:
        If it was to curb anti-Semitism it seems to have failed. :lol:

        It is just one emote, isn't it? Or is there more than one gone?
      •   [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
      • Join the discussion - There is no registration required!

      Name: (Optional)
      Save
      Photo: (Optional)
      Message: (0 / 16,384 chars)

      If you want to embed media, just paste YouTube, Vimeo, Twitter, Instagram, Vine, Liveleak, Imgur (IMAGE or GIFV) links and they'll auto embed.
      Pro tips: Click the angry emojis for popular emoticons/fomotes. Check the trending fomotes for new fomotes.
      • Breaking News:
      • View Topic - SHOULD EMOTES BE BANNED? (I HOPE THEY VOTE YES, BECAUSE I'VE FUCKING LOST THE LOT! FINGERS CROSSED I GET AWAY WITH IT)
      • View Topic - Libs Fucking Owned: Michigan just banned plastic bag bans. Trump should follow with a federal law that does the same.
      • View Topic - Hans, prove you're not a Jew by banning nigger and the schlomo emotes.
      • View Topic - That's it, I'm out. Hans has banned emotes for users not logged in. He has destroyed the board.
      • View Topic - Now that we are banning posters, is there a price list to have somebody banned?
      • View Topic - The last mass shooting resulting in the banning of the Confederate flag. What will be banned after this shooting?